Robert
Downey Jr. has been pardoned. The two
weathermen excused one another.
Weatherman 1 : That actor Robert Downey Jr. has
been pardoned in California.
Weatherman 2 : Pardoned for what?
WM 1 : He was found with a gun and
drugs in his car back in the 1990s.
WM 2 : I guess it was the drugs
which upset them more – everyone has a gun in America thanks to the second amendment
to their constitution.
WM1 : That’s the one lawyers argue about isn’t it.
WM 2 : Yes. The right to keep and bear arms bit originally
referred to militias and was reinforced by several court judgements. But then not
so long back the Supreme Court said it referred to individuals and since they had
guns anyway, the people could hang on to them.
WM 1 : I bet Robert wishes there was that amount of indecision
surrounding drugs.
WM 2 : It used to be cool to take opium based products as painkillers,
but the law decided eventually that was a bad idea as there seemed to be a lot of pain around.
WM 1 : In a different era Robert might have been okay then. Maybe that’s
why he was pardoned.
WM 2 : A pardon is an act of forgiveness. They were saying “let’s bury the hatchet” – he must have turned
his life around.
WM 1 : He has. He’s been to rehab and paid his debt.
WM 2 : Forgiveness is a victim-led process whereby you let go of negative
emotions towards someone over an incident. California was the victim.
WM 1 : He must have been a state-disappointment. A fallen Oscar-nominated
star. He’s supposed to be reinforcing Hollywood’s ego and instead he’s snorting
Cocaine. And although they forgive him, they don’t forget. The conviction still
sits on his record.
WM 2 : So he’s not excused. There’s still a state finger still pointing
at him, it’s just not wagging anymore.
WM 1 : And if I understand it correctly, Robert had to ask for it.
California doesn’t go around seeking out redeemed sinners – they have to flag
it up themselves.
WM 2 : Why would he ask for it?
WM 1 : It means he can do jury service.
WM 2 : Aha, if you have been judged, it’s a vindication to get to do the
judging. He can find someone else guilty of drug taking. It’s like people who stop
smoking. They did 20 a day and now they are some of the most vehement opposers
of the habit.
WM 1 : Isn’t that hypocritical?
WM 2 : It’s more a shifting of position, and in so much it’s like the
argument over whether or not the second amendment
refers to individuals. One ruling says it does, another says it doesn’t.
WM 1 : And he can get his gun back.
WM 2 : Until the Supreme Court changes its mind - then he’s a baddie
again.
WM 1 : So is what Robert did intrinsically wrong?
WM 2 : The ten commandments are in tatters. Adultery is rife, we covet
all sorts of things including other men’s wives, we ignore Sunday as a Holy day....it
didn’t mention guns; they weren’t invented. Today’s right may become tomorrow’s
wrong and vice versa. Who knows.
WM 1 : They can still deport him.
WM 2 : Unlikely. As long as he’s selling movies they’ll keep him...until
they criminalise film making. Come to think of it, there should be a law
against some of the drivel that comes out of Hollywood.
No comments :
Post a Comment